Gear Ratios and Development: How to Calculate What Your Drivetrain Gives

“520% range” is SRAM’s selling point for its 10-52 tooth cassette [1]. The number is accurate, and it tells you neither how far you roll with each turn of the cranks nor whether you’ll make it up the pass with your panniers on. For that you need a calculation: one division and one multiplication, and we’ll take them step by step.

Gear ratio, development, gear inches: three ways of saying the same thing

The terms get mixed up. The gear ratioThe number of teeth on the chainring divided by the number on the cog in use: 50 at the front and 11 at the back make a ratio of 4.55. is the number of wheel turns for one turn of the cranks; the developmentThe distance the bike travels in one full turn of the cranks. Americans mostly skip it and quote gear inches; it’s the same idea in meters (or feet). is the distance covered in that same turn [2]. The first depends only on tooth counts; the second adds the size of the wheel.

Cycling UK explains an older measure, gear inchesThe diameter, in inches, of a directly driven wheel that would travel the same distance per turn of the pedals., a legacy of the penny-farthing, where the size of the wheel was the size of the gear [3]. A bike geared at 72 gear inches goes as far with each turn of the pedals as a 72-inch wheel would [4].

The calculation step by step, from chainring to road

Take a 50-tooth chainring and an 11-tooth cog. The ratio is 50 ÷ 11, or 4.545: the rear wheel turns 4.5 times for each turn of the cranks. A 700 × 25 tire is about 26.8 in in diameter, so the gear is 4.545 × 26.8 = 122 gear inches. In distance, with a circumference of 2.135 m (84.1 in), the bike moves 4.545 × 2.135 = 9.70 m, or 31.8 ft. Run the same numbers for the lowest ratio of a double crankset, 34 teeth in front and 32 behind: 34 ÷ 32 × 26.8 = 28 gear inches, or 2.27 m (7.4 ft). Between the two, a factor of 4.3.

Enlarge diagram

To turn development into speed you need the cadenceThe number of pedal turns per minute (rpm).: speed (mph) = distance per turn (ft) × cadence (rpm) × 60 ÷ 5,280. At 90 rpm the 50×11 gives about 32 mph; the 34×32 at 60 rpm gives 5.1 mph. Sheldon Brown puts a typical easy cadence between 75 and 90 rpm, and warns that pedaling slower than your ideal cadence wastes energy and puts knees and hips at risk [5].

The same math on other wheels shows the effect of diameter. Decathlon, the French retailer, takes a 46×16 ratio: with a 26-inch mountain bike wheel (0.65 m) the development is 5.87 m (19.3 ft); with a 29-inch wheel (0.74 m), 6.68 m (21.9 ft) [2]. At the same ratio, the bigger wheel goes 2.7 ft further per turn of the cranks.

Which circumference should go in the formula?

It’s the one number the spec sheet doesn’t give you. The ETRTO size of the tire (25-622, for example: 25 mm wide, 622 mm bead seat diameter) points to an approximate value in Schwalbe’s table [6]. The maker says itself that it can’t give an exact circumference: it varies with the rim, the pressure and the load. For a bike computer, it recommends a simple roll-out test with the rider in the saddle.

The difference isn’t trivial. Going from a 25 mm to a 40 mm tire on the same 622 mm rim lengthens the development by about 4%; going to a 29 × 2.25, by about 9%. Our article on tire pressure for mountain bikes and gravel bikes covers those widths. For a calculation good to 1%, measure: mark the valve and the ground, roll forward one wheel turn with someone in the saddle, then measure the distance.

Gear inches, meters and gain ratio: moving between them

To go from gear inches to meters of development, multiply by π × 0.0254 m, about 0.0798. Wikipedia gives three landmarks: low gearing is around 20 gear inches (1.6 m, or 5.2 ft, per turn), medium around 70 (5.6 m, 18.4 ft), high around 125 (10 m, 32.8 ft) [4]. Cycling UK works through a 48×16 on a 700 × 28 tire (26.69 inches in diameter): 80 gear inches, or 6.39 m (21.0 ft) [3].

Both measures ignore one thing: crank length. Sheldon Brown proposes the gain ratioThe distance the bike travels divided by the distance the pedal travels around its circle in one turn. It is the gear ratio multiplied by the ratio of wheel radius to crank length. to account for it: with 175 mm cranks instead of 170 mm, the same drivetrain is about 3% lower [7]. Our 50×11, with a 172.5 mm crank (6.8 in), comes to 8.95: (wheel radius of 339.8 mm ÷ crank of 172.5 mm) × 4.545.

The gain ratio is also a reminder that very different combinations can come out the same. Sheldon Brown cites the 39×14 and the 53×19, which both make 2.79 [7]. In the same way, 30×21, 40×28 and 50×35 on a 30/40/50 triple all give a ratio of 1.43.

Reading a cassette: range and gaps between gears

Enlarge photo

The tooth count of each cog is on the cassette or in the maker’s spec. Two numbers sum it up. The rangeThe ratio of the highest to the lowest development of a drivetrain, as a percentage: 52 ÷ 10 = 5.2, or 520% for a 10-52 cassette with a single chainring. gives the breadth: the eight-speed cassette above spans 32 ÷ 11, or 291%. The gap between two consecutive gears gives the fineness: from 11 to 13 teeth it is 18%; from 28 to 32, 14%.

SRAM says its 520% range equals that of two-chainring, 11-cog drivetrains, and that the 38 and 44 tooth cogs tighten the gaps at the big end [1]. Rohloff quotes fourteen gears spaced 13.6% apart, for a range of 526% [8]: the math holds, since 1.136 to the power of 13 is 5.25. A wide range and even gaps can therefore go together; they just cost money.

What lowest development for which terrain?

The benchmarks come from sources aimed at different audiences. For touring bikes, the ADFC, Germany’s cyclists’ association, calls a development climb-friendly (bergtauglich, in its text) up to just over 2 m (6.6 ft), and gives the example of a 26-inch bike with a Rohloff hub, a 44-tooth chainring and a 15-tooth cog: 1.70 m in the lowest gear, 8.92 m in the highest [9]. The German retailer fahrrad-xxl ranks developments under 2.5 m as best for mountains, around 5 m for rolling terrain, about 7 m on flat ground, and more for sporty riders or descents [10].

For gravel, BikeRadar notes that these groupsets typically have a lowest gear below 1:1, meaning a smaller chainring than the biggest cog [11]. Cycling UK puts that 1:1 at about 27 gear inches on a 700C wheel, or 2.15 m (7.1 ft), and cites a single-chainring gravel groupset configurable from 25 to 98 gear inches, or 2.0 to 7.8 m [12].

The table reads both ways. The mountain bike at 18 gear inches climbs at about 3 mph at a relaxed cadence, but barely tops 25 mph at 90 rpm. The road bike at 28 gear inches climbs faster, provided the legs keep up. None of the four is “the right one”: each is right for its terrain.

Comparing two drivetrains: 1x, 2x and cross-chaining

Enlarge photo

To compare two drivetrains, calculate the lowest and highest development, work out the range, then look at the gaps. A single chainring drops a derailleur, a shifter mechanism and a cable: Cycling Weekly puts the saving at 200 to 250 g on average [13]. In return, a very wide cassette with only one chainring means bigger jumps between gears, whereas a double crankset can use closer-spaced cogs without losing range [13].

Even with two chainrings, several combinations give almost the same development. Decathlon advises against cross-chaining, that is a big chainring with a big cog or the reverse: instead of a 46×21, it prefers a 42×18 or a 42×19, which keep the chain straighter [2]. The math bears it out: 46 ÷ 21 = 2.19 and 42 ÷ 19 = 2.21, a 1% difference.

Choosing your gears for the mountains or a loaded bike

A cyclist touring with a load does not need to win a sprint: they need to stay on the bike. Cycling UK puts it this way: a really low gear can make the difference between cycling up a hill and getting off to push, and you get one with a smaller chainring, a bigger cog, or both [12]. The reverse of the opening formula does the job.

Example: you want 1.7 m, the lowest development of the touring bike the ADFC cites, on 700 × 40 tires (2.22 m), with a 32-tooth chainring. The cog is 32 × 2.22 ÷ 1.7 = 41.8, so 42 teeth, which give 1.69 m. With a 28-tooth chainring, you need 37 teeth. It remains to check in the manual that the rear derailleur accepts a cog that size.

For the loaded bike, our guide to the Loire à Vélo shows what the stages look like, and the bikepacking gear list what you carry. Those two pages describe the load; the developments in the table above give what your legs will have to do with it. The rule to remember: fix the lowest development you will need on a climb first, calculate the cog that gives it, and only check the highest at the end.

Worth watching

GCN Tech goes back to basics to show how bike gears work and why they help on hills and different terrain: a visual companion to the math in this guide.

The video is hosted by YouTube (Google): nothing loads until you play it, and Google may then set cookies.

Julien de Jurquet

Vans, RVs, biking and calculators

Julien de Jurquet writes for Outfarer about camper vans, RVs, biking, and calculators. He reads manuals cover to cover and never lets a number slide without its unit, so your choices rest on math, not promises.

All their articles